• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Sony Blames "Anonymous"

I'm going to have to agree with Disposed here fellas. Anonymous doesn't have a MO, they're a group of random internet fucktards and trolls doing whatever they can, for the LOLs... Hell, they barely deserve to be called a "group" at all.

Now, I strongly doubt that Anonymous was responsible for this, but it may very well have been a member of Anonymous. However, this is a major bit of misdirection from Sony. How about rather than telling us that Anonymous did it, they tell us that they've evidence pointing towards the criminals involved and they've turned their logs over to law enforcement for further investigation? Then if it comes out that the morons involved were part of Anonymous, (if that's even possible) they can say, "Joe Smith, who is loosely aligned with the hacker group Anonymous..."

(Not that I think most members of Anonymous are anything more than script kiddies... or a group, but you know the media.)

*As a side note, my several year personal refusal to buy any Sony products continues. It takes work, Sony owns so many brands I have to do some research before I buy anything. The only one I'm not 100% on for several years has been the occasional movie ticket.

I think Anon and every member of it are pieces of shit, but with the things they have admitting to doing there is something of a MO. Or at least something that can show off their level of skill. If this was an organized attack by Anon members under some kind of official bullshit banner they'd probably take credit and make some lame BS statement about doing it to prove a point.
 
I think Anon and every member of it are pieces of shit, but with the things they have admitting to doing there is something of a MO. Or at least something that can show off their level of skill. If this was an organized attack by Anon members under some kind of official bullshit banner they'd probably take credit and make some lame BS statement about doing it to prove a point.

Unless they went too far and are scared.

i dont think its them but this "Cant be them its not their MO" mentality is just plain stupid. Its a random group of fucktards they have no MO and if you think they do you clearly dont have a clue what anonymous is.

Random group of people = random. The guys that fucked with HB gary may not be the same that got into it with westboro.
 
i dont think its them but this "Cant be them its not their MO" mentality is just plain stupid. Its a random group of fucktards they have no MO and if you think they do you clearly dont have a clue what anonymous is.
I'm always chuckling at the news, always trying to assign structure and unity to Anonymous, as if it were one person with one mind.

Anonymous is like a giant Venn diagram, and when there is an intersection of enough sets of people who feel the same way about a single issue, something happens. Then the news people believe that every set thinks the same way. They look so stupid every time they do it.

Anons who like freedom of information hate Sony.
Anons who like piracy hate Sony.
Anons who like hacking hate Sony.
Anons who like petting cute puppies don't give a shit.

But the news people will declare the anons who like petting cute puppies to be Sony haters.
 
Unless they went too far and are scared.

i dont think its them but this "Cant be them its not their MO" mentality is just plain stupid. Its a random group of fucktards they have no MO and if you think they do you clearly dont have a clue what anonymous is.

Random group of people = random. The guys that fucked with HB gary may not be the same that got into it with westboro.

All there is to go off on is what they've taken credit for. Yes you could be right, but the "officially announced" actions show DoS attacks and things to con people into rooting for them. MO is the wrong word probably, but can't really make an argument out of my feelings.
 
All there is to go off on is what they've taken credit for. Yes you could be right, but the "officially announced" actions show DoS attacks and things to con people into rooting for them. MO is the wrong word probably, but can't really make an argument out of my feelings.

Im not saying its them, i highly doubt it it. Im saying that these people acting like they know anon is stupid.
 
Because directly quoting me then saying that is anything but an accusation right. :rolleyes:
Google Translate might not be the best way to read posts and reply. Might I suggest you run things by your ESL teacher first, right. ;)

I think Anon and every member of it are pieces of shit, but with the things they have admitting to doing there is something of a MO. Or at least something that can show off their level of skill. If this was an organized attack by Anon members under some kind of official bullshit banner they'd probably take credit and make some lame BS statement about doing it to prove a point.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! It's always nice when the experts weigh in. Perhaps you could illuminate us as to why exactly you think such righteous internet heroes, particularly those among us on this very forum, are each and every one a "piece of shit". Such a resounding declaration must certainly be the result of much study on the subject with specific and well-informed examples leading to this profound conclusion, as opposed to some lame BS statement completely absent any point or evidence of reasoning at all.

Unless they went too far and are scared.
That must be it. You nailed it, Freud.

i dont think its them but this "Cant be them its not their MO" mentality is just plain stupid. Its a random group of fucktards they have no MO and if you think they do you clearly dont have a clue what anonymous is.
You are obviously the only one here who does have a clue. A raging clue, Joe Hardy.
Lack of modus operandi notwithstanding.

Random group of people = random. The guys that fucked with HB gary may not be the same that got into it with westboro.
Random group is random. Hmm. Sounds like a meme. "Random group of fucktards", however, does not sound at all like any of the the skilled and determined associates who very successfully exposed security firm HBGary along with Palantir and Berico (and possibly law firm Hunton & Williams) leading to a congressional investigation for basically turning their military contracting experience on private targets. And other examples of who they've "fucked with" would include: Scientology, the MPAA/RIAA, Bank of Amerika, Mastercard, Visa, Paypal, The Koch Bros, the Egyptian Government, the Libyan Government, the Iranian Government, Westboro "Baptist Church", and that puppy drowning bitch. Those random fucktards.
Nor does it sound like something you would want to say in reference to an extremely wide-ranging, very large, highly-skilled and much better informed group of righteous crusading heroes who inhabit and garner support from every corner of the internet. It's just not very nice.
 
Ironically... the Wall Street Journal reported, in the 5/4/11 print edition i read today,in one of the articles on SONY, that sony stated anonymous wasnt involved in the data theft....

The next day they changed their minds? They are doing nothing more than deflecting attention from their shitty security to try and blame anonymous, while garnering support to help try and tackle them and eliminate a viable protest movement... whether you agree with them or not...atleast they are attempting to do something about some of the bullshit online and that big corporations do... right or wrong...you also have the ability to protest their actions... write your legislature/congress/senator about them if you dont like it... or join them if you agree... but put up or shut up with all the whining and pick a side.. or remain silent and watch american idol and do nothing like most americans...
 
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! It's always nice when the experts weigh in. Perhaps you could illuminate us as to why exactly you think such righteous internet heroes, particularly those among us on this very forum, are each and every one a "piece of shit". Such a resounding declaration must certainly be the result of much study on the subject with specific and well-informed examples leading to this profound conclusion, as opposed to some lame BS statement completely absent any point or evidence of reasoning at all.

Did you notice the words "think" and "probably" in there? That means its an opinion. So kindly piss the fuck off.
 
There is no way it was over a wiener schnitzel, no way in hell!
 
Did you notice the words "think" and "probably" in there? That means its an opinion. So kindly piss the fuck off.
Interesting. "I think Anon and every member of it are pieces of shit" sounded a lot like an insult, and labeling it an opinion doesn't get you out of being called on it.

Care to provide proof to counter my thoughts? If not leave me the fuck alone troll.
U mad?
I already countered with evidence as well as proof. Or are you referencing chapter 7 of dianetics?
Troll? You fling juvenile insults under the guise of opinion and when asked, very nicely I might add, to clarify by explaining how you came to such a bent you presume to instruct me on the intricacies of urination as a sex act. If I could trouble you to take your lithium, that sense of what is known as "butthurt" that you're feeling would fade as surely as the presumption of entitlement to the right of unqualified "opinion" without recourse.
 
Interesting. "I think Anon and every member of it are pieces of shit" sounded a lot like an insult, and labeling it an opinion doesn't get you out of being called on it.


U mad?
I already countered with evidence as well as proof. Or are you referencing chapter 7 of dianetics?
Troll? You fling juvenile insults under the guise of opinion and when asked, very nicely I might add, to clarify by explaining how you came to such a bent you presume to instruct me on the intricacies of urination as a sex act. If I could trouble you to take your lithium, that sense of what is known as "butthurt" that you're feeling would fade as surely as the presumption of entitlement to the right of unqualified "opinion" without recourse.

And yes I think does qualify as an opinion. I don't like Anon. Too bad if you don't like my opinion, I'm not about to change it. So deal with it.

You were trolling. Rather cute of you to try and deny it you. You countered with nothing but trolling remarks.
 
And yes I think does qualify as an opinion. I don't like Anon. Too bad if you don't like my opinion, I'm not about to change it. So deal with it.
I believe I have dealt with it, repeatedly and successfully. Are you a masochist?
Labeling it an opinion does not disqualify it as an insult, no matter how uninformed it is. And me calling you on your bullshit isn't going to change either, so it is you who must deal with that. I recommend, as in the past, that you do so by providing some reasoning behind your "opinion". I'd like to say I believe that in searching for it, you will come to a far different conclusion, but by your own admission you have revealed yourself as too narrow-minded.

You were trolling. Rather cute of you to try and deny it you. You countered with nothing but trolling remarks.
You have no more entitlement to labeling someone a troll and declaring their success in the venture than to labeling insults as unqualified opinions in trolling remarks of your own. My counters to your insulting Anon were quite clear and contained both reasoning and evidence. It is your own remarks that better fit the definition of trolling.
And while it is true I am cute, I feel it necessary to inform you I am taken and rebuff your advances. I am flattered, though.
 
I believe I have dealt with it, repeatedly and successfully. Are you a masochist?
Labeling it an opinion does not disqualify it as an insult, no matter how uninformed it is. And me calling you on your bullshit isn't going to change either, so it is you who must deal with that. I recommend, as in the past, that you do so by providing some reasoning behind your "opinion". I'd like to say I believe that in searching for it, you will come to a far different conclusion, but by your own admission you have revealed yourself as too narrow-minded.


You have no more entitlement to labeling someone a troll and declaring their success in the venture than to labeling insults as unqualified opinions in trolling remarks of your own. My counters to your insulting Anon were quite clear and contained both reasoning and evidence. It is your own remarks that better fit the definition of trolling.
And while it is true I am cute, I feel it necessary to inform you I am taken and rebuff your advances. I am flattered, though.

I have no need or intention to explain myself to you. It is simple enough to say I don't like Anon or the members of it. Just like I have no need to defend myself against the Scientologist accusations. If you can't handle that, well that isn't my problem. After this post you will be on my ignore list and I will no longer care about what you say.
 
Am I mistaken in that DoS is what LEADS to a lacking of security which then opens it up to more legitimate types of hack? I completely think Anonymous had a large part to play in this unless I am mistaken...

There first has to be a security hole, in order for a DoS attack to succeed, crap security is to blame here.
 
I have no need or intention to explain myself to you.
Erm, thanks for clearing that up, then.

It is simple enough to say I don't like Anon or the members of it.
But that's not what you said. What you said was:
I think Anon and every member of it are pieces of shit, but with the things they have admitting to doing there is something of a MO. Or at least something that can show off their level of skill. If this was an organized attack by Anon members under some kind of official bullshit banner they'd probably take credit and make some lame BS statement about doing it to prove a point.
While admittedly simple, when asked why you felt that way or what information you possessed that led you to such a profound conclusion, you chose only to hurl yet more insults. Fault not the messenger that rains truth upon your delusion.

Just like I have no need to defend myself against the Scientologist accusations. If you can't handle that, well that isn't my problem.
Methinks thou doth protest too much. Who's not handling what now, exactly?

After this post you will be on my ignore list and I will no longer care about what you say.
Grandma always said I was a heart-breaker. There's just not enough to go around.
 
No dos attack is a simple case of your dragging the targets bandwidth down till its a slow as shyt coz there's no firewall in the world that can stop it. You have to disable the firewall sometime to investigate.
But I wouldn't be surprise if some government got some peace in the pie. Look at Stuxnet. Got the stench of a government all over it. Then iranian government hacking Comodo and stealing its security certificates.
 
kubla_khan said:
Methinks thou doth protest too much. Who's not handling what now, exactly?

You know how they say... Walks like a Scino, Talks like a Scino...
 
From way over here, you both look like trolls. Get a room or take it to PM, jeez.

I would love to see what Anonymous says about all this. Someone earlier spoke about the implications for banks. That is scary stuff as far as potential fallout.
 
Stop feeding the trolls. Nothing you say will turn the childish trolling into any form of cohesive discussion.

Yes, because statements like "So kindly piss the fuck off." instead of giving examples that would back up the claim he is being called out on (in of itself being a very loaded, unexplained and trolly remark in context of the discussion in this thread) ... he chooses to respond the way he has.

It could be as simple as saying "I'm not a Scientologist and this is why I dislike what Anon has done..." But, nope. Couldn't even get the first half of a statement like that.
 
Yes, because statements like "So kindly piss the fuck off." instead of giving examples that would back up the claim he is being called out on (in of itself being a very loaded, unexplained and trolly remark in context of the discussion in this thread) ... he chooses to respond the way he has.

It could be as simple as saying "I'm not a Scientologist and this is why I dislike what Anon has done..." But, nope. Couldn't even get the first half of a statement like that.

I did say kindly. And yes my statement about Anon was a tad extreme, I don't have a filter I say what I think its as simple as that. I said I didn't like Anon so people would realize I'm not trying to defend them due to some misplaced belief in their BS. I responded to your accusation by explaining my thoughts fairly clearly. In case you missed it: I think Anon is full of shit. I don't believe that they're doing anything for a noble cause and I don't believe they give a damn about people. And not that its any of your damn business but I don't believe in organized religion period. Happy now?
 
Yes, because statements like "So kindly piss the fuck off." instead of giving examples that would back up the claim he is being called out on (in of itself being a very loaded, unexplained and trolly remark in context of the discussion in this thread) ... he chooses to respond the way he has.

It could be as simple as saying "I'm not a Scientologist and this is why I dislike what Anon has done..." But, nope. Couldn't even get the first half of a statement like that.

Calling someone a scientologist on a forum is trolling, period. If someone walked up to you and insulted you, you dont say "Thats untrue and let me tell you why" and expecting someone to respond like that is fucking stupid. :rolleyes:
 
I did say kindly.

Kindly go die in a fire?

Oh yeah, putting "Kindly" before it changes EVERYTHING.

I think Anon is full of shit. I don't believe that they're doing anything for a noble cause and I don't believe they give a damn about people.

Then you would be deluding yourself if you ever thought it was anything else. This is exactly how Anon themselves describe what they do. They're "in it for the lulz", not because of any perceived altruistic benefits to what they do.

Big fucking whoop. You think a group is full of shit for being exactly what you described them to be. Any other big fucking revelations you'd like to share with us?

Calling someone a scientologist on a forum is trolling, period. If someone walked up to you and insulted you, you dont say "Thats untrue and let me tell you why" and expecting someone to respond like that is fucking stupid. :rolleyes:

Calling someone a troll because they call you out on your shit is trolling. Unclean hands here, buddy. It's exactly the same engagement tactic that you decry when it comes from other people. So I guess expecting people to respond to them when you say they're trolling would be "fucking stupid." :rollseyes:

And not that its any of your damn business but I don't believe in organized religion period. Happy now?

So defensive over having to say you're not a Scientologist... yet... still not saying it. So much you ain't telling us and it shows.
 
Kindly go die in a fire?

Oh yeah, putting "Kindly" before it changes EVERYTHING.

Then you would be deluding yourself if you ever thought it was anything else. This is exactly how Anon themselves describe what they do. They're "in it for the lulz", not because of any perceived altruistic benefits to what they do.

Big fucking whoop. You think a group is full of shit for being exactly what you described them to be. Any other big fucking revelations you'd like to share with us?


So defensive over having to say you're not a Scientologist... yet... still not saying it. So much you ain't telling us and it shows.

In order:

You do realize I was making a smart ass remark right?

Yet most people that like Anon do believe their shit. You see it all the time around here people defending Anon due to some misplaced belief that they're doing it for some kind of cause. And considering their actions even if they're doing it for the hell of it, it still makes them pieces of shit. It still doesn't change my opinion of them.

I think saying I don't believe in organized religion pretty clearly nailed it. I said its none of your damn business, because it isn't. My beliefs, or lack there of, are no one's business but my own. I don't need to say "no I'm not" because I don't care what you think. ZOMG some random person on the internet might think I belong to a religion that is the butt of everyone's jokes. Big. Fucking. Deal. All I'm going to do is keep beating around the bushes with you on this, so feel free to try to continue the discussion I have no intention to ever justify your shit with a real answer.
 
...I have no intention to ever justify your shit with a real answer.

Yet you're willing to justify everything by even responding. Why even bother to respond if all you're going to do is project, deflect, evade and generally be a miserable punkass when people are trying to get a straight answer out of you?
 
Yet you're willing to justify everything by even responding. Why even bother to respond if all you're going to do is project, deflect, evade and generally be a miserable punkass when people are trying to get a straight answer out of you?

Because I'm having fun?
 
And that's what makes you the troll.

If I wanted to troll I would have lead it on further and been more more annoying and argumentative. I was just having fun beating around the bush with my answers and see how you'd react. I did try giving normal responses, but got bored.
 
If I wanted to troll I would have lead it on further and been more more annoying and argumentative. I was just having fun beating around the bush with my answers and see how you'd react. I did try giving normal responses, but got bored.

You're still a troll.
 
You're still a troll.

Can't help you taking it seriously. My opinions were not a troll though. My beating around the bush on the Scientology issue was less a troll and more enjoying dragging you around. Despite that I've yet to say anything I don't believe. Trolling generally involves making someone mad. I'd like to point out that YOU extended the argument after I said why I didn't like Anon. Which I will admit was a mislead reason to dislike them. You gave me an accurate reason to do so.
 
Back
Top