Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and also back to a name (reverse DNS lookup), as well as where the mail server for the domain is, etc.Nacho said:Domain name server = basically puts a name to a ip.
Xipher said:its Domain Name Service, I think you can figure it out from there.
BTW, it has nothing to do with windows domains.
AD attaches itself to DNS, but DNS doesn't depend on AD, that is what I am saying.YeOldeStonecat said:It's quite integrated into Active Directory...you can't have properly setup 2K/XP clients to Active Directory without DNS.
hity645 said:Right now I use it for a Game/File server, but Im trying to expand it to run a Intranet site for my files. So people on my network can type in http://IPADDY and pull up a site with files and stuff.
Xipher said:One is simply a caching server. It simply takes your requests, and caches them for you, so you don't keep having to ask upstream. .
If it does DNS, probably. I have my router doing that, using dnsmasq.gta95 said:ClarkConnect/Ipcop does that right? I would think because it sounds like they should be between router and modem.
As far as I understand, it is just something really geeky to do. DNS resolutions over cable connections take 30ms at most. If you have your own DNS cache server, then it would probably take 2ms. Tangeable difference? I don't think so.cnick79 said:That's what I thought. What benefits does having your own DNS serve?
Staples said:As far as I understand, it is just something really geeky to do. DNS resolutions over cable connections take 30ms at most. If you have your own DNS cache server, then it would probably take 2ms. Tangeable difference? I don't think so.
I use my extra computer for BT because it is low power and is on 24/7 (and no I am not serving commercial software but I suspect most people are), Apache, IIS and all the web crap for testing stuff, file serving, ftp, backup.
Malk-a-mite said:Re: home run DNS servers - it's a nice insultation from Comcast (or other ISP) when they hose their DNS servers again.
Everyone remember the headaches that causes? I'm willing to bet there are still a large number of DSLreport users, as well as [H] and Anandtech members using 4.2.2.2 for their DNS server.