• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

How AI will fail

Ididar said:
SpaceX is going the same route. They're going hardcore into data centres and chips because Grok is falling behind everyone else. xAI is quickly going to become a hardware company, not an AI company.
Click to expand...
they just spent 60 billion on cursor and both benefited from each other quick.

Cursor gave xAi near best in class data, xAI gave cursor best in class compute will have to see a couple of cycle if they can keep an interesting quality per dollar (which arguably they fully achieved with grok 4.5), a bit more expensive than Muse spark but significantly cheaper than the biggest open weight model like GLM 5.2-K3.

It is not keeping up with openAI-anthropic (no one does) but it is with everyone else, ahead of google until they update gemini arguably and they were the last to start in the race, so more pacing people than falling behind.

And because xAI is in part involved (intent layer) of self driving and robotics, the spaceX physic-aeorospace AI simulation, and other first hand use case, they will stay an AI company no matter what externally pretty much and if tesla and spaceX merge (highly probable) they could get more and more involved in tesla product AI.
 
Claude Fable 5 failed me.

Adding "tribute" and "personal usage" doesn't really change what's being asked, unfortunately — the spec is still a point-for-point recreation of the Doom Slayer: the Praetor Suit, the Praetor helmet emblem, the exact color scheme, the signature loadout. Whether it's called a replica or a tribute, the output would be the same protected character design, so I have to give you the same answer as before.
 
Not failing today!

Patch verified and applied correctly at lines 21998-22015 of gateway/run.py. When an approval request fires:

_approval_notify_sync runs after redacting credentials
Calls text_to_speech_tool("Thank you sir, may I have another?") via Piper TTS (using your configured voice/model)
Generates audio file in temp directory
Then sends the approval prompt to chat
 
SOXX is now 200 pt. drop from the top, as of today's nose dive close, but it's still very high, mutual fund closes their book on Halloween day, and hedge fund closes their book in Nov. 30, so I expect much more profit taking as they have to show their book for the yr. on huge profit
 
Last edited:
AI will not fail and it's unfortunate that 99% of people think all AI is chat bots and customer service. But the reality is companies have AI doing so much more and it needs a lot more processing power than chat bots. IMHO, this isn't close to over.

Edit:
Minor tweaks for clarity.

But also, to add that companies that don't rely on AI for LLM have absolutely zero use for DeepSeek or Kimi. You can't use either one to look at a pathology slide and identify cancer cells. You can't use either one to find you a possible super conducting material.
 
Last edited:
I agree the technology is not close to over, but people like Big Short legend Michael Burry is saying the market is ahead of itself. AI does make $, but not the kind of P/E that these chip stock is showing.
 
Happy Hopping said:
I agree the technology is not close to over, but people like Big Short legend Michael Burry is saying the market is ahead of itself. AI does make $, but not the kind of P/E that these chip stock is showing.
Click to expand...
So, historically, nearly every major technology has had a bubble. Bubbles are the norm, not the exception. So, a crash isn't unexpected. But how long until the inevitable crash is the question. After all, markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.

But the one thing I really fear is the whole notion of having the government invest in these companies. Because the returns might not pay off in your lifetime. And then the question comes about, do you as a citizen actually directly receive money from it, or is it the government using it for their own spending? Basically a backhanded way for AI companies to steal your money, but this is more of a soapbox thing.
 
When CBDCs and carbon footprints become part of our personal data, the government will need AI to manage and monitor these matters in detail and in a centralized manner; this is one of the reasons the government is investing in and implementing AI in its administration.
So, yes, some projects or companies in the field of AI will fail, but not all of them.
 
Nytegard said:
But the one thing I really fear is the whole notion of having the government invest in these companies. Because the returns might not pay off in your lifetime. And then the question comes about, do you as a citizen actually directly receive money from it, or is it the government using it for their own spending? Basically a backhanded way for AI companies to steal your money, but this is more of a soapbox thing
Click to expand...
You might not but your progeny will. Americans need to stop thinking about the 'me' and think about 'us'. At least thats the way marketing machine in China makes you think. The boomers over there are all about future generations.
 
The Lurker said:
You might not but your progeny will. Americans need to stop thinking about the 'me' and think about 'us'. At least thats the way marketing machine in China makes you think. The boomers over there are all about future generations.
Click to expand...

The USA has pushed individualism so strongly that causes real problems when trying to think about communities as a whole. Not impossible, but more difficult in the US than other countries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top