• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

AI's Water and Electricity Use Soars In 2026

erek

Fully [H]
2FA
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
17,421
To crunch these numbers, de Vries-Gao built on earlier research that found that power demand for AI globally could reach 23GW this year -- surpassing the amount of electricity used for Bitcoin mining in 2024. While many tech companies divulge total numbers for their carbon emissions and direct water use in annual sustainability reports, they don't typically break those numbers down to show how many resources AI consumes. De Vries-Gao found a work-around by using analyst estimates, companies' earnings calls, and other publicly available information to gauge hardware production for AI and how much energy that hardware likely uses.

Once he figured out how much electricity these AI systems would likely consume, he could use that to forecast the amount of planet-heating pollution that would likely create. That came out to between 32.6 and 79.7 million tons annually. For comparison, New York City emits around 50 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. Data centers can also be big water guzzlers, an issue that's similarly tied to their electricity use. Water is used in cooling systems for data centers to keep servers from overheating. Power plants also demand significant amounts of water needed to cool equipment and turn turbines using steam, which makes up a majority of a data center's water footprint. The push to build new data centers for generative AI has also fueled plans to build more power plants, which in turn use more water and (and create more greenhouse gas pollution if they burn fossil fuels).

AI could use between 312.5 and 764.6 billion liters of water this year, according to de Vries-Gao. That reaches even higher than a previous study conducted in 2023 that estimates that water use could be as much as 600 billion liters in 2027. "I think that's the biggest surprise," says Shaolei Ren, one of the authors of that 2023 study and an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside. "[de Vries-Gao's] paper is really timely... especially as we are seeing increasingly polarized views about AI and water," Ren adds. Even with the higher projection for water use, Ren says de Vries-Gao's analysis is "really conservative" because it only captures the environmental effects of operating AI equipment -- excluding the additional effects that accumulate along the supply chain and at the end of a device's life.”
Source: https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/25/12/18/200251/ais-water-and-electricity-use-soars-in-2025
 
Yeah... I'll believe it when I see it.
The point is an attempt was made.
"The bill has 10 sponsors, all Democrats.
It passed along party lines in the Senate’s budget committee, despite debate among lawmakers and advocates about whether the measure would achieve its goal of insulating regular ratepayers from increased costs."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Decko
like this
I can see it now, very heated county and city hall meetings.
Better be a heated discussion because I'm paying 4-5¢ more than 4 years ago. I'd even want the data centers to reimburse me for the past four years. If they want their AI future then they can pay for their electricity.

August 2021
pseg 2021 august.png


December 2025
pseg 2025 december.png
 
Better be a heated discussion because I'm paying 4-5¢ more than 4 years ago. I'd even want the data centers to reimburse me for the past four years. If they want their AI future then they can pay for their electricity.

August 2021
View attachment 778207

December 2025
View attachment 778206

Don't worry, they will. Most data centers will run primarily off of natural gas generators, which will drive up the price of gas, which will drive up your electricity anyhow.
 
Don't worry, they will. Most data centers will run primarily off of natural gas generators, which will drive up the price of gas, which will drive up your electricity anyhow.
Then you limit data centers to use clean energy like solar and wind with a battery system to maintain consistent power. We're not here to watch as AI companies try to feed their data centers while we suffer. Instead of buying ram they should be investing in renewable energy.
 
Then you limit data centers to use clean energy like solar and wind with a battery system to maintain consistent power. We're not here to watch as AI companies try to feed their data centers while we suffer. Instead of buying ram they should be investing in renewable energy.

Wind, solar and battery systems will not be sufficient baseline load systems for underwriting. The only data centers being underwritten have large volume gas lines and gas turbine allotments. Grid tie will not get you an underwrite, nor will renewable+battery as a baseline.
 
Wind, solar and battery systems will not be sufficient baseline load systems for underwriting. The only data centers being underwritten have large volume gas lines and gas turbine allotments. Grid tie will not get you an underwrite, nor will renewable+battery as a baseline.
I don't care. Just like they didn't care when they drove up electric prices. Use less electricity or order more batteries and solar panels.
tenor.gif
 
I don't care. Just like they didn't care when they drove up electric prices. Use less electricity or order more batteries and solar panels.
View attachment 778275

The nation with the most energy wins. It is that simple. The government has throttled energy investment in the United States for decades now, and it's gone from being inconvenient for consumers to a massive detriment to national security and industrial competition. It was fine when we were outsourcing all of our manufacturing. Now, we are facing the cliff of that decision. Conserving energy use should have never been the goal, it should have been maximizing energy availability.
 
The nation with the most energy wins. It is that simple.
But who's winning within the nation? AI data centers winning is not a win for the people. When it comes to renewable energy, China is ahead of USA.
The government has throttled energy investment in the United States for decades now, and it's gone from being inconvenient for consumers to a massive detriment to national security and industrial competition. It was fine when we were outsourcing all of our manufacturing. Now, we are facing the cliff of that decision. Conserving energy use should have never been the goal, it should have been maximizing energy availability.
Nobody said to conserve energy, but to stop taking it from civilian infrastructure. Go nuclear, go solar, go wind, but don't do anything that drives up the cost of living for civilians. I said stop using power and you came back with generators. Just sounds like these AI data centers don't want to invest in clean power.
 
But who's winning within the nation? AI data centers winning is not a win for the people. When it comes to renewable energy, China is ahead of USA.

Nobody said to conserve energy, but to stop taking it from civilian infrastructure. Go nuclear, go solar, go wind, but don't do anything that drives up the cost of living for civilians. I said stop using power and you came back with generators. Just sounds like these AI data centers don't want to invest in clean power.

Nuclear is a pipe dream in timeframes that matter due to regulatory environment. Clean energy is impossible to underwrite for baseline generation due to lack of reliability and cost. It's fine for backup. Industry has spoken, if you have a different idea feel free to provide risk capital to the market of your choosing. Thermal from gas is the absolute best for cost/reliability/efficiency and everyone knows this.
 
Nuclear is a pipe dream in timeframes that matter due to regulatory environment.
Time is only a factor because the AI bubble will pop before anyone can get a nuclear power plant going.
Clean energy is impossible to underwrite for baseline generation due to lack of reliability and cost. It's fine for backup.
Why can China do it and not USA? Communist China has something capitalist USA doesn't?
Industry has spoken, if you have a different idea feel free to provide risk capital to the market of your choosing. Thermal from gas is the absolute best for cost/reliability/efficiency and everyone knows this.
Unfortunate for data centers, we live in a democracy. NJ voted for data centers to pay more and now they'll pay more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherk
like this
ummm no. China is the biggest polluter on planet earth. By leaps and bounds.

As of July 2024, China operates 1,161 coal-fired power plants, significantly more than any other country, with India and the United States each having over 200 plants.
In contrast, the United States has 204 operational coal-fired power plants.
China's coal fleet has grown substantially, with the country adding nearly 267,000 MW of coal capacity since 2015, while the U.S. retired over 100,000 MW of coal capacity during the same period.
 
ummm no. China is the biggest polluter on planet earth. By leaps and bounds.

Correct. China is an all energy approach. They build a lot more coal than solar, but plenty of solar. They are taking a more of everything approach.
 
ummm no. China is the biggest polluter on planet earth. By leaps and bounds.
As others stated two things can be true at the same time. Kind of like how you can have the most have the best highest efficiency PSU possible that also consumes the most wattage due to usage.

And while the US is trying to rollback planned clean energy projects China has been accelerating. And hopefully the US will not make it worse by extending this political hate of renewable energy into hydro/dams, as many are in dire need of renovation.
 
Nuclear is a pipe dream in timeframes that matter due to regulatory environment.
"It'll take ten years to bring a new oil refinery online, so there's no point in doing it", Democrats and BANANAs (some overlap) said...for the last 20 years. The best time to do it was then. The second best time to do it is now. The exact same applies to nuclear plants.

And if the BANANAs' red tape, not to mention endless obstructionism, wasn't there, it wouldn't take nearly so long, either.
 
"It'll take ten years to bring a new oil refinery online, so there's no point in doing it", Democrats and BANANAs (some overlap) said...for the last 20 years. The best time to do it was then. The second best time to do it is now. The exact same applies to nuclear plants.

And if the BANANAs' red tape, not to mention endless obstructionism, wasn't there, it wouldn't take nearly so long, either.
What the hell are BANANAs?
 
You can thank all the Climate change BS over the last decaded for stalling much needed infra across North America, we the citizen get screwed while corps get richer and NGO's got funding to lobby governments, to further screw citizens.
 
Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything. NIMBYs taken to the extreme.
I hate acronyms. So let me get this straight. Blame the Democrats and BANANAs for not building infrastructure? Building a data center typically takes
2 to 6 years. Natural gas and coal can range from 2-4 years for construction. Renewable energy like Solar/Wind takes 1-2 years. The only type of power plant that can take a while is nuclear, and Japan can build them in 3-4 years, and China can do it in 5-6 years. Yet, somehow, the data centers were built without any consideration how they'd get powered? No wait, it was considered. They considered the locals to pay for the difference.

Keep in mind that of all the ram the AI data centers bought, the ram hasn't been made, along with the GPU's they're suppose to go into. Chances are any new Data Centers are going to take longer to get built. Considering how much quicker it takes to build renewable energy for the Data Centers, it can be done ahead of time before the Data Center goes online. Don't give me it isn't feasible, because there's plenty of Data Centers that already do. You're too busy with Democrats living in your head rent free, that you didn't do the math. If the Data Centers don't want to pay for the increased cost of energy that they're causing, then they can go fuck off. Preferably someplace they can setup renewable energy to power the damn things.

ram prices.jpg
 
I hate acronyms. So let me get this straight. Blame the Democrats and BANANAs for not building infrastructure? Building a data center typically takes
2 to 6 years. Natural gas and coal can range from 2-4 years for construction. Renewable energy like Solar/Wind takes 1-2 years. The only type of power plant that can take a while is nuclear, and Japan can build them in 3-4 years, and China can do it in 5-6 years. Yet, somehow, the data centers were built without any consideration how they'd get powered? No wait, it was considered. They considered the locals to pay for the difference.

Keep in mind that of all the ram the AI data centers bought, the ram hasn't been made, along with the GPU's they're suppose to go into. Chances are any new Data Centers are going to take longer to get built. Considering how much quicker it takes to build renewable energy for the Data Centers, it can be done ahead of time before the Data Center goes online. Don't give me it isn't feasible, because there's plenty of Data Centers that already do. You're too busy with Democrats living in your head rent free, that you didn't do the math. If the Data Centers don't want to pay for the increased cost of energy that they're causing, then they can go fuck off. Preferably someplace they can setup renewable energy to power the damn things.

Datacenters are absolutely being built with consideration about where they get their power. It's from natural gas. I am currently working with folks to predict placement of these things and find ideal locations - the current criteria to get underwritten to purchase/begin process of a datacenter is 1) Must have mulitple large diameter natural gas pipelines 2) Must have offtake agreement in place with one or multiple natural gas midstream companies 3) Must have purchase agreement with GE or other natural gas turbine producer with a build date <5 years out. 4) Must have grid tie agreement with emergency baseline load available or 5) must have contract for battery storage sufficient for baseline on site with procurement <5 years out. Renewable energy as a carbon credit offset, or token battery top off, is as much renewable exposure these datacenters can tolerate for underwriting. In short, nobody is investing serious capital in a datacenter with baseline fed from any intermittent source.
 
That's why I couldn't stop laughing when I realized how much power was needed for these data/factory mega centers. I knew all the green energy, global warming BS was fixing to get flushed down the toilet. The save the planet folks now want Ai data centers more then electric cars. The ONLY way to get there is the shortest path that is Nat Gas power production. Whats even funnier is some may even try and push coal, I can hear it now " we will use coal just to get started while the pipelines are being built, it's only temporary". TRUST US!!!
 
Datacenters are absolutely being built with consideration about where they get their power. It's from natural gas.
Like I said, they're putting this onto the locals to pay the difference.
I am currently working with folks to predict placement of these things and find ideal locations -
2fb8e5f25e68944640555f6cd24999c6.gif

the current criteria to get underwritten to purchase/begin process of a datacenter is 1) Must have mulitple large diameter natural gas pipelines 2) Must have offtake agreement in place with one or multiple natural gas midstream companies 3) Must have purchase agreement with GE or other natural gas turbine producer with a build date <5 years out. 4) Must have grid tie agreement with emergency baseline load available or 5) must have contract for battery storage sufficient for baseline on site with procurement <5 years out.
Did you ever consider that the increased cost of gas to the locals might actually push them to pass laws to put that cost burden onto said data centers? It's not a Democrat or Republican issue either, unless you think either group of people are big into increased cost of living? At the benefit to a technology meant to take their jobs.
Renewable energy as a carbon credit offset, or token battery top off, is as much renewable exposure these datacenters can tolerate for underwriting. In short, nobody is investing serious capital in a datacenter with baseline fed from any intermittent source.
Other data centers have been doing it. You're just bad at your job.
That's why I couldn't stop laughing when I realized how much power was needed for these data/factory mega centers. I knew all the green energy, global warming BS was fixing to get flushed down the toilet. The save the planet folks now want Ai data centers more then electric cars. The ONLY way to get there is the shortest path that is Nat Gas power production. Whats even funnier is some may even try and push coal, I can hear it now " we will use coal just to get started while the pipelines are being built, it's only temporary". TRUST US!!!
The only people who think AI can fix problems are the fools who invested into AI. That's when the AI hammer turns every problem into a nail. When this AI idiocy is over, it'll all become distilled into a drop down menu in Photoshop. It'll be called AI Gaussian blur.
AI hammer.png
 
I do not have anything to do with the metrics involved with underwriting data centers. It's not being bad at my job, it's a function of not looking to pick strawberries in an apple orchard. Criteria is at the mercy of those that have hundreds of millions of capital to deploy. There is not a single GW scale datacenter that is renewable primary in the US. Period. End of story. Matador, gas. Project Jade, gas. Stargate, gas. Hyperion, gas. Homer City, gas. Colossus, gas. Prometheus, nuclear - the smallest of the bunch at 1 GW. Anything large is gas. There are a few small ones - 100-250 MW that are some mix of renewable and grid tie. Currently under development is 25-35GW of gas and 3-5GW of renewable.
 

“America’s AI Boom Is Running Into An Unplanned Water Problem​

Water isn’t just another environmental input. It is the constraint that exposes the governance failure at the heart of the data‑center boom.

Unlike electricity—which can be expanded with new generation and transmission—water availability is bounded by geography, hydrology, and climate. In many standard cooling systems, water evaporates—not returned to the watershed —removing it from the local cycle, a key issue highlighted by the International Energy Agency.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kensil...m-is-running-into-an-unplanned-water-problem/
 
Calling wind "clean" energy is either completely ignorant, or a bold faced lie. Outside of wanting to take advantage of the tax dollars that get wasted on it, the only good reason for wind power is that you don't have any other option available.
 
Calling wind "clean" energy is either completely ignorant, or a bold faced lie. Outside of wanting to take advantage of the tax dollars that get wasted on it, the only good reason for wind power is that you don't have any other option available.
I'd like to hear the nonsense explanation you have that makes wind power unclean?
 
I'd like to hear the nonsense explanation you have that makes wind power unclean?
It never recovers it's power production costs. You pollute more, manufacturing, emplacing, servicing, and dismantaling at eol than if you just used natgas. That's just provided it doesn't just burn down or chunk it's vanes, which they do with an annoying regularity. It's not clean. It's just not as dirty as old coal. Pretend it's nonsense if you like. I'm fine with that.
 

Trump Says Microsoft To Make Changes To Curb Data Center Power Costs For Americans

Anonymous Coward 36 minutes ago
4
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: President Donald Trump said in a social media post on Monday that Microsoft will announce changes to ensure that Americans won't see rising utility bills as the company builds more data centers to meet rising artificial intelligence demand. "I never want Americans to pay higher Electricity bills because of Data Centers," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Therefore, my Administration is working with major American Technology Companies to secure their commitment to the American People, and we will have much to announce in the coming weeks."

[...] Trump congratulated Microsoft on its efforts to keep prices in check, suggesting that other companies will make similar commitments. "First up is Microsoft, who my team has been working with, and which will make major changes beginning this week to ensure that Americans don't 'pick up the tab' for their POWER consumption, in the form of paying higher Utility bills," Trump wrote on Monday. Utilities charged U.S. consumers 6% more for electricity in August from a year earlier, including in states with many data centers, CNBC reported in November.

Microsoft is paying close to attention to the impact of its data centers on local residents. "I just want you to know we are doing everything we can, and I believe we're succeeding, in managing this issue well, so that you all don't have to pay more for electricity because of our presence," Brad Smith, the company's president and vice chair, said at a September town hall meeting in Wisconsin, where Microsoft is building an AI data center. While Microsoft is moving forward with some facilities, the company withdrew plans for a data center in Caledonia, Wisconsin, amid loud opposition to its efforts there. The project would would have been located 20 miles away from a data center in the village of Mount Pleasant.”
 
near us.......... hard to stop these data centers from being built..........shame

https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nc/ch...-county-proposed-data-center-creates-backlash
Local councilors are really cheap to bribe compared to national politicians. Wave a bit of tax money in front of their face, most of which you never plan to pay, and promise lots of jobs most of which you'll never create ... and boom, they're sold. Come back in a couple years and they'll have outsourced most of the jobs and twisted the local tax law into a pretzel to avoid paying much of anything.
 
Back
Top