Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Thanks guys!
If anyone is ever in the SE Michigan area (Ann Arbor specifically), I may take you up on the party time offer! Cold beers are always in the fridge...
Thanks Celerator! It's been a long run to get into the NSZ.
Of course, if you look at the future production, in about 2 weeks I'll get bumped
by WRat and have to wait another couple weeks to get back into the top 20.
I need those cheap 45nm Quads to become available to I can upgrade
my...
Yeah, I remember the days of Genome@Home. Lots of fun putting together a massive dump from 10-20 machines that had been cranking for a week straight :)
Now, just buy or borg a few quads, run the SMP client and you're good to go. Not that there's anything wrong with that... I'm doing both...
I don't know either, but if they consume 40W each, that'd be a 3840W draw and at $0.10/kWh, that'd be $9.22 a day or $276 a month in electricity. It wouldn't take long to buy a few C2D setups or Quad cores with that kind of outlay and be ahead in the long run.
I've recently shut down all my...
Well, not exactly. It would have to run the standard client (too slow for SMP), so it'd only crank out about 3000 PPD (76.8/2.8*110). A single quad core or two C2D setups would easily beat this in production and could be built for < $1000.
It would probably cost hundreds of $$ per month to...
E6700 C2D @ 3.4 GHz
P2651 (1760) @ 12:28/f = 2033 PPD (598 PPDpGHz)
BTW, this same machine gets 11:37/f on the 1760 WU running the SMP client in VMware for 2182 PPD so it's pretty close...
It's more like the other way around, the SMP client kills the GPU performance. I've found that GPU + SMP is only worth it when the SMP client isn't crunching on the 1760 pt WUs.
The 1760 pt WUs take 95+% of the total available CPU which doesn't leave enough for effective GPU folding. The...
Yep, the Commodore 64 was a very cool computer for the time. I had one of those as well. And then the natural progression to the Amiga 1000 which was mind blowing in terms of being ahead of its time technology wise.
I really enjoy firing up some of the computer emulators to explore those...
No doubt! Lots of memories.
It's serial #004266 of at least 50,000 that were made.
That's probably $2000-$2500 of 1979 dollar goodness sitting there. Those floppies
were close to $500 each and held 88KB. You could use a hole punch and make them
double sided though :)
I remember...
I agree with mwarps. If you feel like pushing the limits, you can run the SMP Linux client in VMware on that machine and get your current monthly output in less than 4 days.
My 3.4 GHz E6700 running just the VMware client at this instant is churning out 2191 PPD :eek: while working on a 1760...
BTW, as crazy as 22 million times faster sounds, it's really only a 75.8% speed increase every year for 30 years which is certainly within the realm of possibility!
If only my 401k would increase at 75.8% annually :) (especially in light of the market sell-off today)
I've been working on resurrecting my first childhood computer. This beast is almost 30 years old and I spent many long hours typing in and programming BASIC on this machine. Lots of good memories.
For grins, I wanted to calculate what kind of folding performance it would have.
It's hard...
If you're going to spend new money, anything less than a X1950Pro probably isn't worth the money spent and you'd be better off putting that money toward a new C2D machine to run the SMP client.
I'm running an AGP X1950Pro coupled with a 3 GHz P4 which churns out a nice ~575 PPD at stock...