Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
If it was smaller ... like, 40"-42". 55 too beaucoup. I tried using an LG 55" as a computer monitor a while back and the sheer size of it made it unusable at the distance i sat. The PPI wasn't so great either compared to my 40" 4k screen.
28" is way too small for 4k imo. I'd say go for a high refresh 1440p if your options are limited to displays around this size. Note that you will not be able to take advantage of FreeSync if you have an nVidia gpu.
I still have the BDM4065UC and while the picture quality is overall really good I can confirm that what bothers me the most about it is the colors. They look dull and washed out. Sliding digital vibrance up in the nVidia control panel helps, but also causes brighter shades to be crushed. Would...
They like to max out peak brightness as far as possible as it helps to A: sell their panels in retail viewing conditions and B: inflate their contrast ratios without providing better black levels.
HDMI 2.1, 120hz at 4k, and variable refresh rate seems like a possibility on LG's 2018 OLED displays. The Xbox Scorpio is also going to have HDMI 2.1 and will support VRR. Support for these features on a high profile console is exactly what the market needs in order to get panel manufacturers to...
Large 4k TV on an appropriate VESA wall or ceiling mount imo.
How far away would he be sitting from it? I have a 40" 4k monitor, and at more than 5ft away I think the text would be too small to read. Scaling up the desktop defeats the purpose of having the added screen real estate of 4k.
I have got both a ROG Swift 1440p TN panel with gSync and a 40" early generation 4k monitor, the Philips BDM4065UC. If I had to pick one or the other, I'd stick with the 4k display. The Swift only sees use when I'm playing a fast paced, competitive online game, which I've been playing less and...
On my 40" 4k monitor, 1080p looks like garbage. 1440p is a lot better. Both resolutions are massively inferior to running games at 4k. At lower resolutions colors look somewhat washed out and using anti-aliasing is a must especially at 1080p, whereas most games look better without AA filters at 4k.
It is worth mentioning that the ~21ms input lag figure they are citing is from the E7 in gaming mode. So we can expect input lag to be comparable to the 2016 models post-firmware update, I guess.
These have been around for ~9 months now. Any early adopters of these care to comment on how they've been holding up? Image retention problems, pixel issues, color integrity?
I like that they went with a brushed metal look for the bezel. Some well known posters around these parts have often complained of how the shiny black bezels used on most monitors and TVs degrade the perceived contrast ratio.
I'm pretty sure the ability to run most games at 4k at 120 fps on dual card setups would already be a reality if nVidia didn't artificially gimp their gpu lineup for the sake of having more room to release more cards that are only moderate upgrades at best (but still upgrades and therefore...
Acer also has a 32" 4k IPS panel with gsync but it is very expensive and only 60Hz.
Within a year from now we will have 4k 120/144Hz options with gsync or freesync. So I'd wait personally.